AG˹ٷ

STOCK TITAN

Daily Journal Corporation Provides Additional Public Access to its New Form 8-K

Rhea-AI Impact
(Neutral)
Rhea-AI Sentiment
(Negative)
Tags

Daily Journal Corporation (NASDAQ:DJCO) has issued a press release addressing allegations from Buxton Helmsley USA, Inc. (BuHeUI) regarding its software accounting practices. The company firmly refutes claims made by BuHeUI's CEO Alexander E. Parker, who alleged DJCO was improperly expensing software development costs instead of capitalizing them under ASC 985-20.

The company's Audit Committee, along with accountants and third-party experts, confirmed that DJCO's current accounting practices are correct. The company explained that while some software companies capitalize costs under ASC 350-40 for internal-use software, DJCO's products primarily involve licensed software delivered to customers, making ASC 985-20 the appropriate standard. The company maintains that Parker's analysis was fundamentally flawed, including his misinterpretation of practices at Tyler Technologies and Galaxy Gaming.

Daily Journal Corporation (NASDAQ:DJCO) ha pubblicato un comunicato per rispondere alle accuse avanzate da Buxton Helmsley USA, Inc. (BuHeUI) riguardo alle sue pratiche contabili relative al software. L'azienda respinge con decisione le affermazioni del CEO di BuHeUI, Alexander E. Parker, secondo cui DJCO avrebbe imputato a conto economico i costi di sviluppo software invece di capitalizzarli ai sensi dell'ASC 985-20.

Il Comitato per la Revisione Contabile, insieme ai revisori e a esperti esterni, ha confermato che le procedure contabili adottate da DJCO sono corrette. L'azienda ha spiegato che, sebbene alcune società di software capitalizzino i costi secondo l'ASC 350-40 per il software a uso interno, i prodotti di DJCO consistono principalmente in software concesso in licenza ai clienti, per i quali lo standard applicabile è l'ASC 985-20. DJCO sostiene inoltre che l'analisi di Parker contiene errori di fondo, inclusa un'errata interpretazione delle prassi di Tyler Technologies e Galaxy Gaming.

Daily Journal Corporation (NASDAQ:DJCO) ha publicado un comunicado en respuesta a las alegaciones de Buxton Helmsley USA, Inc. (BuHeUI) sobre sus prácticas contables relacionadas con el software. La compañía rechaza categóricamente las afirmaciones del CEO de BuHeUI, Alexander E. Parker, quien afirmó que DJCO estaba registrando como gasto los costes de desarrollo de software en lugar de capitalizarlos bajo la norma ASC 985-20.

El Comité de Auditoría, junto con contadores y expertos externos, confirmó que las prácticas contables actuales de DJCO son correctas. La empresa explicó que, aunque algunas compañías de software capitalizan costes bajo la ASC 350-40 para software de uso interno, los productos de DJCO son principalmente software con licencia entregado a clientes, por lo que la norma aplicable es la ASC 985-20. La compañía sostiene además que el análisis de Parker es erróneo en lo esencial, incluida su interpretación equivocada de las prácticas en Tyler Technologies y Galaxy Gaming.

Daily Journal Corporation (NASDAQ:DJCO)� 소프트웨� 회계 관행에 관� Buxton Helmsley USA, Inc. (BuHeUI)� 주장� 대� 보도자료� 발표했습니다. 회사� BuHeUI� CEO Alexander E. Parker가 DJCO가 소프트웨� 개발비를 비용으로 처리하고 ASC 985-20� 따라 자본화하지 않았다고 주장� 내용� 강력� 부인합니다.

감사위원회와 회계 담당� � �3� 전문가들은 DJCO� 현재 회계 처리 방식� 적절하다� 확인했습니다. 회사� 일부 소프트웨� 기업� 내부 사용 소프트웨어에 대� ASC 350-40� 적용� 비용� 자본화하� 반면, DJCO� 제품은 주로 고객에게 라이선스 형태� 제공되는 소프트웨어이므� ASC 985-20� 적합� 기준이라� 설명했습니다. 또한 회사� Parker� 분석� 본질적으� 잘못되었으며 Tyler Technologies와 Galaxy Gaming� 관행을 오해했다� 주장합니�.

Daily Journal Corporation (NASDAQ:DJCO) a publié un communiqué en réponse aux allégations de Buxton Helmsley USA, Inc. (BuHeUI) concernant ses pratiques comptables liées aux logiciels. La société rejette catégoriquement les affirmations du CEO de BuHeUI, Alexander E. Parker, qui affirmait que DJCO avait enregistré en charges les coûts de développement logiciel au lieu de les immobiliser selon l'ASC 985-20.

Le comité d'audit, ainsi que les comptables et des experts externes, ont confirmé que les pratiques comptables actuelles de DJCO sont appropriées. La société a expliqué que, bien que certaines éditeurs capitalisent les coûts selon l'ASC 350-40 pour les logiciels à usage interne, les produits de DJCO consistent principalement en des logiciels sous licence fournis aux clients, rendant l'ASC 985-20 applicable. DJCO soutient en outre que l'analyse de Parker est fondamentalement erronée, notamment en interprétant mal les pratiques de Tyler Technologies et Galaxy Gaming.

Daily Journal Corporation (NASDAQ:DJCO) hat eine Pressemitteilung veröffentlicht, um Vorwürfe von Buxton Helmsley USA, Inc. (BuHeUI) zu seinen Software-Bilanzierungsmethoden zurückzuweisen. Das Unternehmen weist die Behauptungen des BuHeUI-CEO Alexander E. Parker zurück, wonach DJCO Entwicklungskosten für Software fälschlicherweise als Aufwand gebucht statt nach ASC 985-20 zu aktivieren.

Der Prüfungsausschuss sowie Wirtschaftsprüfer und unabhängige Experten bestätigten, dass die derzeitigen Bilanzierungsmethoden von DJCO korrekt sind. Das Unternehmen erläuterte, dass zwar einige Softwarefirmen Kosten nach ASC 350-40 für intern genutzte Software aktivieren, die Produkte von DJCO jedoch überwiegend lizenzierte Software darstellen, die an Kunden geliefert wird, weshalb ASC 985-20 das zutreffende Regelwerk ist. DJCO erklärt zudem, dass Parkers Analyse erheblich fehlerhaft sei, unter anderem durch eine falsche Interpretation der Praktiken bei Tyler Technologies und Galaxy Gaming.

Positive
  • Company's Audit Committee, accountants, and third-party experts validate current accounting practices
  • Clear explanation and transparency regarding accounting standards and practices
  • Strong governance demonstrated through thorough review of allegations
Negative
  • Ongoing dispute with activist investor could divert management attention
  • Multiple regulatory complaints filed against the company, despite being based on incorrect assumptions

Insights

DJCO defends its accounting practices against incorrect allegations by an activist investor who misunderstood software accounting standards.

Daily Journal Corporation has issued this press release to address accusations from Buxton Helmsley USA and its CEO Alexander Parker regarding the company's software accounting practices. Parker claimed DJCO was improperly expensing software development costs rather than capitalizing them under ASC 985-20, even demanding a 15% share of stock price appreciation as compensation for his "idea."

This release represents a thorough technical rebuttal by DJCO's management. The company explains that Parker fundamentally misunderstood the applicable accounting standards. After review with its audit committee, accountants, and third-party experts, DJCO confirms it has been correctly accounting for software development costs under ASC 985-20.

The company provides an educational explanation of the relevant accounting standards, noting that modern agile development methodologies create such a short window between technological feasibility and general release that few companies actually qualify for meaningful capitalization under ASC 985-20. DJCO clarifies that the examples Parker cited (Tyler Technologies and Galaxy Gaming) are likely capitalizing under a different standard (ASC 350-40 for internal-use software) that doesn't apply to DJCO's business model.

What's particularly notable is the company's direct and somewhat pointed response to Parker, even quoting the late Charlie Munger (former DJCO chairman) about handling mistakes. The defensive tone and comprehensive explanation suggest management views these accusations as serious but unfounded threats requiring public clarification to protect shareholder interests and the company's reputation.

This represents a classic case of activist shareholder conflict, but with the unusual twist that the activist appears to have based their demands on an incorrect understanding of accounting standards. The company's detailed response indicates they believe these allegations, while misguided, require public addressing to prevent misinformation from affecting market perception.

LOS ANGELES, Aug. 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Daily Journal Corporation is issuing this press release to provide additional public access to the Form 8-K it filed earlier today with the Securities and Exchange Commission in response to the continued interest in our software accounting from Buxton Helmsley USA, Inc. and its Chairman and CEO, Alexander E. Parker. Below is the text of our Form 8-K.

Item 8.01 Other Events.

In July, the Company started receiving letters from an investment adviser called Buxton Helmsley USA, Inc. (“BuHeUI�) alleging that the Company has been improperly expensing its software development costs and should be capitalizing them under the accounting requirements set forth in ASC 985-20, Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed (“ASC 985-20�).  According to BuHeUI and its Chairman and CEO, Alexander E. Parker, switching from expensing development costs to capitalizing them would unlock value for Company shareholders, and he demanded a 15% share in the appreciation of the Company’s stock price as compensation for his idea.  He pointed to Tyler Technologies and Galaxy Gaming as proof that other software companies “properly comply� with ASC 985-20 by capitalizing their development costs.

Simply stated, Mr. Parker got it wrong. Following receipt of his initial letters, the Audit Committee of the Board re-reviewed the applicable accounting guidance and the Company’s practices with its accountants and with third party experts. All agree that the Company has been correctly accounting for its software development costs in accordance with ASC 950-20. 

To understand Mr. Parker’s mistake requires a brief explanation of the relevant accounting standards. Historically, most software companies accounted for development costs under ASC 985-20, which establishes the requirements a company must meet to capitalize those costs when associated with software to be sold or licensed to a third party.

A company is only allowed to capitalize costs incurred during the period after the technological feasibility of the software has been established and prior to its general release. Ironically, one of the main accounting concerns in the past had been that companies would capitalize too much and too soon, because it helped improve their short-term earnings by reducing expenses and moving them to the balance sheet (or, as Mr. Parker might say, “unlocking value�).

Moreover, the process of software development has substantially evolved at many companies since the initial ASC 985-20 guidance was issued, with most companies now applying an agile software development methodology that emphasizes iterative development in a continually changing environment. This results in the capitalization window between technological feasibility and general release to be so short that few companies incur any material amount of costs that would qualify for capitalization. The Company’s software products and our agile development efforts are in that camp.

In addition, with the growing popularity of software-as-a-service (or “SaaS�), companies that make predominately SaaS software take the position that their software is being developed for “internal use� because their customers are purchasing access to a hosted product, rather than actually receiving the software.  This is important because “internal use� software is accounted for under an entirely different accounting standard: ASC 350-40, Internal Use Software (“ASC 350-40�).  You should expect to see more capitalized costs for a SaaS company taking this position because ASC 350-40 provides that eligible costs can be capitalized over a typically much longer development window compared to the short window for “external use� software (like ours) under ASC 985-20.

Neither Galaxy Gaming nor Tyler Technologies expressly states in its public filings which accounting guidance it used to capitalize costs, and we suspect Mr. Parker simply assumed it was ASC 985-20.  He appears to have been mistaken. Galaxy refers in its 10-K to �internally developed software� in its consolidated statements of cash flows, and Tyler refers in its 10-K to the “amortization of software development for internal use� in its G&A expenses. This means, in both cases, that they are likely capitalizing costs for “internal use software� under ASC 350-40 � not ASC 985-20. And, yes, the Company does offer some SaaS enhancements to our eSeries products, but the Company would not qualify for ASC 350-40 treatment because the vast majority of our software continues to be licensed to customers (almost entirely courts and government agencies) to whom we deliver the software, with those customers arranging for hosting based on their own security and operational needs.

Lest there be any doubt, the Company has and will continue to expense development costs when that is the proper thing to do, and it will capitalize any such costs in the future when that is the proper thing to do.  It will also disclose any specific R&D costs separate and apart from other expenses, if material.

Mr. Parker may never admit that he was wrong or that he simply misunderstood why other software companies are capitalizing development costs, given that they appear to be using a completely different accounting standard than the one cited in each of his nine letters so far.  At a minimum, he should be embarrassed for demanding compensation from the Company, alleging securities law violations, calling for the resignations of the CEO and CFO, insisting on being given two Board seats, reporting the Company to the enforcement division of the SEC, referring the Company’s auditor to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, alleging wild conflicts of interest by our directors, and falsely claiming defamation � all based on a mistake.

Mr. Munger once offered some sage advice that may be useful for Mr. Parker, who is currently advertising on his website for new investors to entrust their money with him and his approach: 

“There’s no way that you can live an adequate life without many mistakes.  In fact, one trick in life is to get so you can handle mistakes.  Failure to handle psychological denial is a common way for people to go broke.�

On behalf of its shareholders, the Company calls on Mr. Parker to do the right thing and end his misplaced, self-serving attacks on the Company and its people, so that they can focus their attention on unlocking actual business value.

#

Contact: Jessica Marshall  (778) 716-6706


FAQ

What allegations did Buxton Helmsley make against Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO)?

Buxton Helmsley alleged that DJCO was improperly expensing software development costs instead of capitalizing them under ASC 985-20, demanding a 15% share in stock price appreciation as compensation for this idea.

How did Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO) respond to the software accounting allegations?

DJCO's Audit Committee, accountants, and third-party experts reviewed the allegations and confirmed the company's current accounting practices are correct, explaining that ASC 985-20 is the appropriate standard for their primarily licensed software business.

What is the difference between ASC 985-20 and ASC 350-40 accounting standards?

ASC 985-20 applies to software sold or licensed to third parties, with a short capitalization window between technological feasibility and release. ASC 350-40 applies to internal-use software and SaaS products, typically allowing for a longer development cost capitalization window.

Why does Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO) not capitalize software development costs like Tyler Technologies?

DJCO explains that unlike Tyler Technologies, which appears to use ASC 350-40 for internal-use software, DJCO's software is primarily licensed and delivered to customers who arrange their own hosting, making ASC 985-20 the appropriate standard.

What actions did Buxton Helmsley take against Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO)?

Buxton Helmsley sent nine letters, demanded Board seats, called for CEO/CFO resignations, reported DJCO to the SEC enforcement division, referred their auditor to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and alleged conflicts of interest - all based on their misunderstanding of accounting standards.
Daily Journal Corp

NASDAQ:DJCO

DJCO Rankings

DJCO Latest News

DJCO Latest SEC Filings

DJCO Stock Data

584.94M
1.25M
9.57%
68.97%
9.5%
Software - Application
Newspapers: Publishing Or Publishing & Printing
United States
LOS ANGELES